Rethinking the Evidence for ICDs for HFrEF in Light of Today’s GDMT Posted on December 5th, 2024 by LEADconnection Post navigation Previous: Electrical Variables, Not Valve Type, Predict Need for Pacemaker After TAVINext: ACC.25
Electrical Variables, Not Valve Type, Predict Need for Pacemaker After TAVI Posted on December 2nd, 2024 by LEADconnection Post navigation Previous: Infections No More Likely With Reconditioned Versus New PacemakersNext: Rethinking the Evidence for ICDs for HFrEF in Light of Today’s GDMT
Infections No More Likely With Reconditioned Versus New Pacemakers Posted on November 22nd, 2024 by LEADconnection Post navigation Previous: Physiologic pacing in congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries with electroanatomic mapping guidance: a case report.Next: Electrical Variables, Not Valve Type, Predict Need for Pacemaker After TAVI